LONDON (Reuters) – Pro-Brexit lawmakers in Britain’s upper house of parliament tried on Thursday to thwart the approval of a new law that would force Prime Minister Theresa May to seek a delay to prevent a disorderly EU exit on April 12 without a deal. Britain’s Prime Minister Theresa May speaks in the Parliament in
LONDON (Reuters) – Pro-Brexit lawmakers in Britain’s upper house of parliament tried on Thursday to thwart the approval of a new law that would force Prime Minister Theresa May to seek a delay to prevent a disorderly EU exit on April 12 without a deal.
Britain’s Prime Minister Theresa May speaks in the Parliament in London, Britain April 3, 2019, in this screen grab taken from video. Reuters TV via REUTERS
May has already committed to seek a short extension to Britain’s European Union membership and work with the opposition Labour Party to come up with a different exit plan, in a last-ditch attempt to keep control after her own Brexit deal was rejected three times by the lower House of parliament.
But lawmakers have used an unprecedented procedural gambit to pass legislation without the approval of government, seeking additional legal guarantees that May will not give up and lead Britain out of the bloc without a deal.
The bill passed through the lower chamber, the House of Commons, by a single vote late on Wednesday and is now in the House of Lords, an unelected body whose role is to refine and scrutinise legislation before it is approved.
The process of passing the bill through the Lords got off to a rocky start on Thursday when some members of the debating chamber – also known as peers – launched a series of attempts to delay or even halt the process.
“All that lies between us and tyranny is that we respect the conventions of both Houses,” said Michael Forsyth, a pro-Brexit Conservative member of the Lords, accusing Labour Party spokeswoman Dianne Hayter of setting a dangerous precedent to try and block Brexit.
“CONSTITUTION IN DANGER”
By long-standing convention, the government usually has sole control of the agenda in parliament but this was overturned last month with the help of a rebellion in May’s Conservative Party.
“She is in danger of tearing up our constitution in order to make a narrow party political point,” Forsyth said
Thursday’s debate began with long speeches on the correct procedure for the legislation and a series of votes, all of which ended in heavy defeat for the filibusterers but ate up time.
“What we are seeing today … is a small group of unelected peers in an unelected house, firstly trying to stop us considering the bill today and then trying to talk it out and no doubt seeking to go through the night to halt the Commons’ desire to prevent a no deal,” Hayter said.
The stalling tactic proved partially successful. Plans to complete all stages of the process in a single day had to be abandoned, but a source close to negotiations on the timetable for the bill said they expected it to be finalised on Monday.
The government does not have a majority in the Lords, and the body is seen as largely pro-EU. It is expected to vote in favour of the bill, hence its opponents’ decision to use procedural means to block it.
The law is being rushed through a legislative process which usually takes months, to try and make sure it comes into effect before May attends a summit of EU leaders on April 10.
If successful, it would require May to get parliament’s approval for the detail of any delay and allows lawmakers to propose a different length of extension. The government has argued that it is an unnecessary measure which could have unintended consequences.
Under the revised timetable, the legislation could complete its final stages late on Monday, which would then require May to come to parliament on Tuesday and set out for what length of delay she is planning to ask the EU.
Reporting by William James and Kylie MacLellan; Editing by Stephen Addison and John Stonestreet